There are some political cliches that are—or have become—virtually meaningless except for emotional cant (e.g. “liberal”).
There are some that serve as shibboleths for a faction (e.g. “social justice”).
And there are some that signify immediately that a person has no idea how the real world works, at all—perhaps because they forgot their proper cynicism about the rent-seekers who swarm all over politics, or perhaps because they were always too ignorant about some relevant and necessary subject (political science, economics, law, journalism, diplomacy, strategy, technology, etc.).
A great many cliches manage all three failures of political language, like “shipping jobs overseas” or the supposed “invasion of our borders.”
This is how people, possibly well-meaning people, habitually think and supposedly communicate when they engage in politics. And yet many expect to solve human social problems this way, instead of adding to them. Which is precisely what happens; rather than alleviating inequality or liberating people (or whatever people imagine they’re doing), such invested, balkanized ignorance is deeply useful to those who seek power or to capitalize on a position of power.
At best, largely powerless people experience a vicarious, illusory and temporary sense of power from crowing or venting their spleen.
Disappointment with the outcome is really ridiculous—absurd even. It’s obvious enough, should one stop to think about it. Repeating the same mistake over and over is not a formula for success.
Just imagine, say, taking the same moralistic, hierarchical, jabbering group approach to something practical, like building a house,* baking a cake,* balancing an account,* curing a diseased patient,* starting a business,* or writing a book*—all far simpler than meeting the needs of human society—and you may begin to get the picture.
Politics defined as mass problem-solving is a deeply foolish endeavor.
* Yes, all references intentional.